Tuesday, March 31, 2009

How Will We Cope While Savior Is Abroad?

If you woke up feeling empty today wondering what you should do next now that the annointed one(The Most Hallowed Barack Obama) is in Europe spreading his Gospel, your not alone. It's hard to imagine myself moving forward without his strong inspirational leadership let alone the country moving forward. I myself am lighting a candle and will use it as a source of focus and inspiration and as it grows shorter so will the time until the master returns.
Fortunately, like Allstate he's left us in good hands with the likes of Turbo Tax Geithner, All Illegals are Heroes Pelosi, I Didn't Know He Was a Prostitute Frank and Mr. AIG I'm Not a Crook Dodd.Together they will see us through the darkness and keep our collective consciousness focused in the Commisars absence.
Comrades, I leave you with these words once spoken many years ago. However, of late they seem to ring true once again. "From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs" Karl Marx.

Wake Up America!

Monday, March 30, 2009

Ulterior Motive To Global Warming (Big Surprise There)Fox News Report

The UN Makes it Official: Global Warming Hysteria Is All About Redistributing Wealth
By Noel SheppardAssociate Editor, Newsbusters.org
For years, climate realists around the world have been warning the international community that the entire man-made global warming myth and resulting hysteria is all a scheme to redistribute wealth under the pretense of saving the planet.
In a document obtained by FOX News, the United Nations has made it official.
As FOX News executive editor George Russell reported Friday:
A United Nations document on “climate change” that will be distributed to a major environmental conclave next week envisions a huge reordering of the world economy, likely involving trillions of dollars in wealth transfer, millions of job losses and gains, new taxes, industrial relocations, new tariffs and subsidies, and complicated payments for greenhouse gas abatement schemes and carbon taxes — all under the supervision of the world body.
Those and other results are blandly discussed in a discretely worded United Nations “information note” on potential consequences of the measures that industrialized countries will likely have to take to implement the Copenhagen Accord, the successor to the Kyoto Treaty, after it is negotiated and signed by December 2009. […]
The 16-page note, obtained by FOX News, will be distributed to participants at a mammoth negotiating session that starts on March 29 in Bonn, Germany, the first of three sessions intended to hammer out the actual commitments involved in the new deal.
Some of the ideas discussed in this document eerily resembled what NASA’s James Hansen wrote to Barack Obama last December:
A rising carbon price is essential to “decarbonize” the economy, i.e., to move the nation toward the era beyond fossil fuels. The most effective way to achieve this is a carbon tax (on oil, gas, and coal) at the well-head or port of entry. The tax will then appropriately affect all products and activities that use fossil fuels. The public’s near-term, mid-term, and long-term lifestyle choices will be affected by knowledge that the carbon tax rate will be rising.
The public will support the tax if it is returned to them, equal shares on a per capita basis (half shares for children up to a maximum of two child-shares per family), deposited monthly in bank accounts. No large bureaucracy is needed. A person reducing his carbon footprint more than average makes money. A person with large cars and a big house will pay a tax much higher than the dividend.
Maybe more concerning, Obama’s 2010 budget proposal includes a carbon cap-and-trade scheme, although there is some question as to whether this will survive the coming battle on Capitol Hill. ABC’s George Stephanopoulos reported last Friday that cap-and-trade will likely be sacrificed this year as Obama and Congressional Democrats focus attention on health care.
Beyond this, recent polls have revealed an increasing skepticism by the public concerning the veracity of media reports regarding global warming. These same polls also find that the appetite for expensive solutions during a recession is waning.
Add to this the recent findings which suggest the current cooling trend that began in 1998 could last for at least another decade; the folks looking to use this manufactured crisis as a means of redistributing wealth must be realizing that the window of opportunity is starting to close.
As such, they may believe this upcoming December meeting in Copenhagen is their last chance, thereby making this 16-page document a formal game plan for what is likely the beginning of a nine month full-court press.
Let’s be honest, folks like Nobel laureate Al Gore have their reputations and their very fortunes on the line here, so we should all expect a great deal of hysterical media coverage in the near future — especially after the hurricane season begins in May.
Here’s my advice, America: Prepare now for the coming storm.
Noel Sheppard is associate editor of the Media Research Center’s NewsBusters.org. He welcomes feedback at nsheppard@newbusters.org.

Saturday, March 28, 2009

Whacko Left To Turn Out The Lights

This weekend through out the world there will be a rolling one hour blackout. Cities across the globe will turnout their lights for one hour in a symbolic gesture to highlight the ravages of climate change which are about to be-fall mankind. Last year a similar event was orchestrated by non other than the high priest of climatological doom Al Gore. Unfortunately, to the dismay of last years participants research revealed that by turning out the lights they actually increased their carbon footprint. It seems all the manuevers necessary to pull this event off required the use of more energy than if they would have just left the lights on. So this year not to be disauded by facts they decided to call it a symbolic event. One thing is for sure, you can never accuse the radical environmentalist's of letting the facts get in the way. Speaking of the facts who in this movement decided that carbon is the scourge of mankind? Evidently, this group is long on wind and short on science. Carbon is the basic element of all living things. When paleontologists want to find out how old a specimen is they carbon -14 date it. Carbon degrades at a uniform rate and by seeing how much carbon is left yields the age of a specimen. Yes all decaying matter, animal and plant alike release carbon into the atmosphere as they decay. When we breathe we release carbon dioxide and take in oxygen. Plants in turn ,take in carbon dioxide and release oxygen. It's called a cycle, the earth is a sphere of many cycles all of which intertwine on some level to form what we call the cycle of live. If the goal of the environmentalist is to stop carbon emissions they should start by taping their mouth's shut thats a huge source of wasted carbon emissions.
Unfortunately, carbon is not the only left turn(pardon the pun) these pseudo-climatoligists such as Al Gore have made. They have over simplified the workings of the atmosphere. To reduce it's complexity to only the exchange of carbon dioxide and its resultant by-products is to be ignorant at best, and purposely mis-leading at worst. In their haste to forward their mantra of global warming based solely on carbon emissions, they ignore many other variables that makeup this varied and complex phenomenon we call climate. The next time one of your global warming friends starts prophesising to you about our impending doom, ask if when coming to their conclusions have they also looked into all the other variables in the climate equation. Continental drift,vulcanism,solar wind,sun spots,solar prominences, global continental orientation, complex hydrologic cycle, sea currents,wild fires,geo- thermal conduction,ozone,wind,percipitation,altitude and a host of others of which there are to many to mention. Then to end the conversation ask them pointedly what the average global temperature should be. See if there is no fixed constant of what the ideal temperature of the planet should be there is no argument to make for global warming.
Consequently, the only conclusion that can be drawn from all this global warming hysteria is that it is driven by politics not science. It serves the globalists well. It's a center point where all nations can come together in a common cause. A perfect jumping off point for a one world government. Don't mistake this union of nations as a good thing. It's not about the betterment of mankind it's about the consolidation of power. Regretably, the young people who make up much of this movement are well meaning. Sadly, a dumbed down educational system with far less emphasis on science and mathematics has left the young open to be preyed upon by the likes Al Gore, and entrepreneurs who see the "green movement" as a quick way to make a buck. Unfortunately, its not just the under-educated who have been swept out to sea by this riptide of lunacy. The very professors entrusted to educate and promote constructive debate from which knowledge is discerned are active participants in this charade. Anyone familiar with higher education understands the term publish or perish, and the fight for money to conduct research. It's much easier to swim downstream than up. Simply stated, the hot topic of the time is global warming thats where the money is. To go contrary to the prevailing winds in academia assures financial castration. No money,no research,no publish,no job.
Fortunately, of late more and more scientists have been coming out against global warming and hopefully reason and common sense will prevail in the long run. To let our country and way of life fall victim to a power grab by a bunch of ego driven charletans and politicians, would be a far worse fate than any scenario that global warming would bring forth.

Thursday, March 26, 2009

United States To Blame For Mexico Violence (Hillary Clinton)

Here we go again. The United States to blame for more of the worlds problems. Hillary Clinton upon her arrival in Mexico yesterday for a meeting with Mexico's president Calderone was quick to point out that the United State's unsatiable need for drugs was the driving force in Mexico's drug war. She further pointed out the movement of weapons from the United States into Mexico was supplying the cartels with the weapons to engage in this war. Though initial examination of her argument concludes she is correct and we are complicent on many levels. It's ironic however, that Mrs. Clinton a democrat and left leaning proponent of an open Mexican border would be the one to say this. For years the democrats have stood in the way of tightening border security. In addition, they have quashed all attempts to ratchet up sentencing for drug related crimes. Liberal leaning judges have chosen to interpret the law rather than execute the law. Furthermore, these drug offenders(many of whom are illegal aliens)when their sentences are up rather than being returned to Mexico are released into our general population. I wonder who's running these weapons across the border? I'm guessing illegal aliens(to you liberals thats undocumented citizens). How can we even begin to make this country safe when the party in power can't even bring itself to call an illegal an illegal?
Hillary heres some ideas for you and your politically correct weinies' in Washington.
1)Build a fifty foot wall five feet thick.(might have been nice of you guys to allot money for this in the stimulus bill)Apparently American safety isn't a priority.
2)Deploy the national guard along the border.
3)Truth in sentencing when dealing with drug offenders. Execute the law don't interpret it.
4)Deport drug involved illegal aliens.
5)Read the Webster's Dictionary definition of the term illegal. Then try saying it quietly at first and then louder as you become more comfortable with it.
There you have it a quick and simple formula for success on the border. Please Mrs. Clinton no more panels to study the socialogical impact of calling someone an illegal. No impact studies on the ecological implications of a fifty foot wall on the habitat of the earthworm. It's time to stop intellectualizing what is obvious to a ten year old. Do your job. Serve the people. You work for us.

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Barack Obama Administers NyQuil To Nation

Its quite apparent by last nights sonabulistic presentation by the "Annointed One", that the eloquence and smooth dancing rhetoric he exibited during his ascendancy has gone to sleep along with last nights television audience. Words that once served him well no longer evoke thoughts of Camelot or a brighter day. He appears mystified by the very fact that his presence isn't enough to soothe the masses. The Pavlovian response his verbiage evoked on the campaign trail when preaching to his flock is somehow absent. Apparently, the community organizer turned icon has come to the realization (or at least many other people have) that the words that flowed with such verbosity earlier are falling on an increasing number of deaf ears now.
Mr. Obama, you constantly evoke the name of Abraham Lincoln, and you subliminally, if not overtly, allude to your shared experience. Take my word for it Mr. President, the likeness only lives in you own delusion. President Lincoln led with deeds and conviction not vacuous words that float into space for lack of weight. He rose from nothing. He was self educated and driven by the conviction that he could truly help his young nation grow stronger, and he best exemplified the spirit of manifest destiny which lived in the heart of the early settlers. No Mr. Obama, you best exemplify the weakness that is all pervasive today. You are a product of the socialist strangled halls of academia. You are merely the resultant vector of a perfect storm of liberal education and corrupt Cook County politics which allowed you this meteoric rise.
However,unlike a meteor the gravity of earth will not seal your demise, your demise resides in the very words you speak. When you ran for president the people weren't enamored with you, they were excited over the chance of a better day. They believed you, they put stock in your words and promises. See Mr. President your not disappointing me or anyone else who saw through your game of three card monty . You're disappointing the very people who stood agape at your very utterance, and in these very people resides your demise .

Thursday, March 19, 2009

Senora Pelosi Meets With Her Heroes (Illegal Aliens)

Nancy Pelosi yesterday took time out from her usual liberal rantings to visit a church in wacky town(San Francisco). She was greeted by the usual host of left coast weirdos,freaks and mal-contents which pretty much summarizes her constituency. However, the guests of honor were none of the aforementioned individuals, her guests of honor were non other than a group of illegal aliens. Yes, illegal aliens(can anyone tell me when Webster changed the meaning of the word illegal?) who im sure are one of her most powerful voting blocks. It seems in certain cities in this country illegals can find safe harbor in churches, no doubt San Francisco is one such city. As troubling as all this seems it gets worse. Nancy Pelosi(the 3rd most powerful person in our government,although some would argue 1st)called the illegals Heroes. She went on to say that our country not only treats them unfairly but their treatment by our border enforcement agencies is un-American. She further elaborated that the fact that they were able to withstand all the trevails it took to get here makes them all heroes. Her statements must make border patrol agents wonder just what their roles are. Maybe they should cut holes in the border fence and usher the illegals in. They then could also be heroes.
Obviously,the violence and drug war that is going on in Mexico is of no importance to Ms. Pelosi. Also the fact that 40% of the prisoners in California are illegal aliens means nothing to her either.
She evidently only values power. The safety of the American people and the law she is sworn to uphold is unimportant. Civil disobedience is ok when it serves her needs.
Unfortunately, the chances of her being defeated in an election are slim and none considering where she is from and who and what she represents. Like I said in an earlier blog elections have consequences, and this administration is one of them. Wake up America before it is to late.

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Barack Obama Gives Finger To War Veterans

The most benevolent one Barack(tele-prompter)Obama recently revealed that one of the things on his never ending agenda of disarray was to make wounded veterans pay for war incurred injuries with their own private insurance. This I guess shouldn't surprise anyone seeing that on inauguration night he spurned Congressional Medal of honor recipients hosting a ball, in favor of partying with a group of left coast liberal hollywood elites. It's quite apparent where his sensibilities reside. I guess this is what he meant when he said he would be a transparent president. Well I salute you mister president for keeping your word. No question, your ideaology,intention and direction are in plain sight for anyone who is not blinded by your empty rhetoric and pseudo-intellectual demeanor to see.
Unfortunately, the only hope we have is that he continues to orchestrate this train wreck of an administration to the point where his own constituency starts to unravel. Elections have consequences! Hopefully, these consequences aren't terminal for this country. Lets hope that the center right democrats and turn coat republicans who voted for change realize that change for the sake of change is akin to purchasing a house with the proceeds from a lottery ticket your buying next week. It should be apparent to all by now that the lottery ticket you purchased was a loser.

Tuesday, March 17, 2009

War on Our Border. Who Cares? We Should

In case you haven't noticed there is a war taking place just south of our border with Mexico. Over the last couple of years various Mexican drug cartels are battling for control of lucrative drug routes into the U.S. It seems that calls for increased security along the border by local politicians and residents of the area have fallen on deaf ears. The Obama administration in it's usual long on rhetoric and short on substance approach to problems seems to be turning a deaf ear on the problem. However, in all honesty the Bush White House did little to ameliorate the problem either.
Over the last year over six thousand people have been killed in Mexico directly attributed to drug violence. And close to one thousand have been killed in the last three months in Juarez alone. Several of the killings are especially brutal, it seems that be-headings are the fare of the day. It's not unusual for the Juarez coroner to get fifty deliveries a day, and despite all of this happening right at our border our government does nothing.
Consequently, Phoenix, Arizona has the dubious distinction last year of being the number two city in kidnappings in the world next to Mexico City. It's rumored that many of the drug cartel leaders have taken up residence on this side of the border, and most of the kidnappings are brought on as a result of the drug violence. Mexican immigrants who use to venture over the border for a better life are now turned into drug couriers. Many of them are victims in this war for drug profits.
Evidently, Mr. Obama doesn't see any of this as a threat to our national security. He obviously feels that stopping the flow of illegal immigrants into this country and closing our borders would be viewed negatively by the latino community. It couldn't be that the hispanic community votes heavily democratic and that may be factored into the equation?
Unfortunately, it's become apparent in less than two months that the new administration despite all its promises and ballyhoo is just a rudderless ship awash in a sea of lies.

Monday, March 16, 2009

Gun owners beware (Read Very Important !!!!!!!!!!

Subject: Gun Law Update by Alan Korwin, Democrats have already leaked a gun-ban list. Forward or send to every gun owner you know....

Gun Law Update by Alan Korwin,
Author Gun Laws of America

Gun-ban list proposed..


Slipping below the radar (or under the short-term memory cap), the Democrats
have already leaked a gun-ban list, even under the Bush administration when
they knew full well it had no chance of passage (HR 1022, 110th Congress)
It serves as a framework for the new list the Brady's plan to introduce shortly.

I have an outline of the Brady's current plans and targets of opportunity,
It's horrific. They're going after the courts, regulatory agencies, firearms
dealers and statutes in an all out effort to restrict we the people. They've
made little mention of criminals.

Now more than ever, attention to the entire Bill of Rights is critical. Gun
bans will impact our freedoms under search and seizure, due process,
confiscated property, states' rights, free speech, right to assemble and
more, in addition to the Second Amendment.

The Democrats current gun-ban-list proposal (final list will be worse):

Rifles (or copies or duplicates):

M1 Carbine, Sturm Ruger Mini-14, AR-15, Bushmaster XM15,
Armalite M15, AR-10, Thompson 1927, Thompson M1; AK, AKM, AKS, AK-47,
AK-74, ARM, MAK90, NHM 90, NHM 91, SA 85, SA 93, VEPR; Olympic Arms PCR;
AR70, Calico Liberty, Dragunov SVD Sniper Rifle or Dragunov SVU, Fabrique
National FN/FAL, FN/LAR,or FNC, Hi-Point20Carbine, HK-91, HK-93, HK-94, HK-PSG-1,
Thompson 1927 Commando, Kel-Tec Sub Rifle; Saiga, SAR-8, SAR-4800, SKS with detachable magazine, SLG 95, SLR 95 or 96, Steyr AU, Tavor, Uzi, Galil and Uzi Sporter, Galil Sporter, or
Galil Sniper Rifle ( Galatz ).

Pistols (or copies or duplicates):

Calico M-110, MAC-10, MAC-11, or MPA3, Olympic Arms OA,
TEC-9, TEC-DC9, TEC-22 Scorpion, or AB-10, Uzi.

Shotguns (or copies or duplicates):
Armscor 30 BG, SPAS 12 or LAW 12, Striker 12, Streetsweeper.
Catch-all category (for anything missed or new designs):

A semiautomatic rifle that accepts a detachable magazine and has:

(i) a folding or telescoping stock,
(ii) a threaded barrel,
(iii) a pistol grip (which includes ANYTHING that can serve as a grip, see below),
(iv) a forward grip; or a barrel shroud.

Any semiautomatic rifle with a fixed magazine that can
accept more than 10 rounds (except tubular magazine .22 rimfire rifles).

A semiautomatic pistol that has the ability to accept a detachable magazine,
and has:


(i) a second pistol grip,
(ii) a threaded barrel,
(iii) a barrel shroud or
(iv) can accept a detachable magazine outside of the pistol grip, and
(v) a semiautomatic pistol with a fixed magazine that can accept more than 10 rounds.

A semiautomatic shotgun with:
(i) a folding or telescoping stock,
(ii) a pistol grip (see definition below),
(iii) the ability to accept a detachable magazine or a fixed magazine capacity of more than 5 rounds, and
(iv) a shotgun with a revolving cylinder.

Frames or receivers for the above are included, along with conversion kits.

Attorney General gets carte blanche to ban guns at will:

Under the proposal, the U.S. Attorney General can add any "semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use, or a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General."

Note that Obama's pick for this office Eric Holder wrote a brief in the Heller case supporting the position that you have no right to have a
working firearm in your own home.

In making this determination, the bill says, "there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a firearm procured for use by the United States military or any federal law enforcement agency is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and a firearm shall not be determined to be
particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely because the firearm is suitable for use in asporting event."

In plain English this means that ANY firearm ever obtained by federal officers or the military is not suitable for the public.

The last part is particularly clever, stating that a firearm doesn't have a sporting purpose just because it can be used for sporting purpose -- is that devious or what? And of course, "sporting purpose" is a
rights infringement with no constitutional or historical support whatsoever, invented by domestic enemies of the right to keep and bear arms to further their cause of disarming the innocent.

Respectfully submitted,

Alan Korwin,

Author Gun Laws of America
http://www.gunlaws.com/gloa.htm

Forward or send to every gun owner you know.....AND/OR ALL AMERICANS WHO BELIEVE IN THE CONSTITUTION...........

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Amateur Hour at the White House

It's apparent after fifty days in the White House that Barack Obama and his team of tax cheats and adolescent buffoons haven't a clue. It would make great comedy if it wasn't so serious. Unfortunately, what's also apparent is that Barack Obama's Chicago organizing skills don't translate well to the national level. If the team he put together is any indication of his ability in this area he'd have trouble organizing a dog fight in his own back yard.
Camile Paglia a renowned scholar, writer, and radical feminist democrat also criticized Barack Obama's appointments recently. She stated that if Mr. Obama has any hope of getting elected to a second term he should throw several of his closest advisers on the scrap heap. Ms. Paglia was especially angered by the democratic attack on Rush Limbaugh, and the handling of a recent visit by Britains Prime Minister Brown. The British prime Minister would have received a warmer welcome at the Fred Sanford residence than he received at the White House. Evidently, old western European alliances are of little import to the new left slanting administration.
As a conservative I have to admit on a base level I get a degree of vicarious enjoyment from all the disarray the first fifty days have yielded. However, as an American it sickens me to think this is the best we have to offer when it comes to leadership. Hopefully, as in times past, the American peoples resolve and penchant for liberty and what's right will overcome the insufficiencies of our leaders. Like the old adage says"What doesn't kill you makes you stronger." My fingers are crossed.

Tuesday, March 10, 2009

Melting Arctic Ice Raises Sea Levels? What?

President Barack Obama said yesterday that ideology would not impede scientific reasearch into uses for embryonic stem cells. Why then is the scientific method subjagated by ideology when it comes to global warming?
Lets perform a simple test. Place several ice cubes in a glass, go ahead fill it to the top. Now let it sit there until it melts. Voila, after melting the water yielded from the ice melt no longer reaches the top of the glass. Why is this? Because water when it freezes expands,and when it thaws it contracts.
Please have your global warming friends explain to you how melting arctic ice will raise sea levels if arctic ice displaces more sea water than the resulting runoff will. This can also be shown with snow. It's not unusual to have someone die of thirst when stranded out in the snow. See it takes 10 inches of snow to yield 1 inch of water.
I'snt it amazing how liberals cling to ideology when it best forwards one of their agendas. Someone from our esteemed media should confront Mr. Obama with this dichotomy and see why ideology trumps science in this instance.

Monday, March 9, 2009

Polar Bears need Al Gore

Since Al Gore feels global warming is such a pressing issue, and that carbon dioxide pollution is hurling us to certain disaster. It seems only fitting that the creator of the internet, the esteemed nobel laureate and renowned climatologist and blowhard himself Al Gore, should head north and aide the polar bears in their time of need. It seems according to Al that the ice is melting at such a furious pace that the polar bears are having to swim miles between ice flows to find their food. Its only fitting that the great benevolent,all knowing all caring one should take to the water and head north seal blubber in one hand and carbon credits in the other.

Monday, March 2, 2009

Stock Market continues to react negatively to Obama plan.

It's 9am and the market already has plunged 155 points. It's becoming apparent the only ones with faith in Obama's recovery plan , is Obama and his diciples. The business community (contrary to liberal belief) which is the true foundation of our economic system has little belief in an imminent recovery. Especially, one based on the premise that taxing the already stressed business community is the anwer. It's beginning to look like a misery loves company scenario the Obama camp is putting forth. Lets penalize success, let them see what its like to suffer like us. its a classic case of class warefare.
However, I find it amazing how the rich politicians use the word us when referring to poverty. I wonder when was the last time Clinton,Biden,Obama,Pelosi or Reed visited their local Walmart, for that matter even shopped for themselves. See all the above see themselves as the chosen ones. They feel they can relate and even at times empathise with the poor, and thusly by proxy are also poor. If Obama is allowed to get his way and socialism grabs hold, the very poor they purport to represent will still be poor, and Obama and his group will still be rich. The key to success is what it always was in this country, hardwork,determinism, and reliance on one's self . As Thomas Jefferson said" A country that is strong enough to give you all you desire, is also powerful enough to take away all you have".

Sunday, March 1, 2009

Barack Obama's assault on logic.

Its quite apparent that despite Mr. Obama's query into higher education at Harvard he failed to master the basic tenants of logic . Somehow in his skewed logical understanding of the present economic environment, he deduced that the destruction of business would best yield economic recovery. Apparently, to President Obama if you destroy the benefactors the recipients will flourish. Unfortunately, on the left it seems Obama has many deciples who stand astride with him, and likewise share this counter-intuitive logic.
Obviously, the liberal brain is unable to comprehend any type of thought process beyond the basic senses, primarily,touch and feel. This being the case id like to propose an earmark. Whereas, the next porkubus bill conatin monies set aside for a university study on why liberal brains have a mutated logic gene. This will better serve all of mankind more than any preservation study of the harvest mouse.
Kosat G. Karvounis